dharᄋma simᄋuᄋlaᄋtion

  • Buddhism
  • philosophy
  • art
  • creativity
  • nature
  • photography
  • Q/A
  • Archive
  • RSS
  • Ask simulating questions
  • Submit simulating things
banner
Graphing the History of Philosophy
Each philosopher is a node in the network and the lines between them (or edges in the terminology of graph theory) represents lines of influence. The node and text are sized according to the number of connections (both in and out). The algorithm that visualises the graph also tends to put the better connected nodes in the centre of the diagram so we see the most influential philosophers, in large text, clustered in the centre. It all seems about right with the major figures in the western philosophical tradition taking the centre stage. (I need to also add the direction of influence with a arrow head – something I’ve not got round to yet.) A shortcoming however is that this evaluation only takes into account direct lines of influence. Indirect influence via another person in the network does not enter into it. This probably explains why Descartes is smaller than you’d think. It would also be better if the nodes were sized only by the number of outward connections although I think overall the differences would be slight. I’ll get round to that.
Pop-upView Separately

Graphing the History of Philosophy

Each philosopher is a node in the network and the lines between them (or edges in the terminology of graph theory) represents lines of influence. The node and text are sized according to the number of connections (both in and out). The algorithm that visualises the graph also tends to put the better connected nodes in the centre of the diagram so we see the most influential philosophers, in large text, clustered in the centre. It all seems about right with the major figures in the western philosophical tradition taking the centre stage. (I need to also add the direction of influence with a arrow head – something I’ve not got round to yet.) A shortcoming however is that this evaluation only takes into account direct lines of influence. Indirect influence via another person in the network does not enter into it. This probably explains why Descartes is smaller than you’d think. It would also be better if the nodes were sized only by the number of outward connections although I think overall the differences would be slight. I’ll get round to that.

    • #education
    • #philosophy
    • #history
    • #infographic
    • #visualization
    • #technology
  • 11 months ago
  • 5
  • Comments
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet

5 Notes/ Hide

  1. pocketforstupidcomments likes this
  2. lifeandcode reblogged this from dharmasimulation
  3. itsalljustenergyandinfoman reblogged this from dharmasimulation
  4. dharmasimulation posted this

Recent comments

Blog comments powered by Disqus
← Previous • Next →

noun. the teachings of the buddha as they are applied to the problem of human suffering in a world that has lost touch with any easily discernible reality

etymology. धर्म, j. baudrillard



flickr photostream

like me on facebook

follow me on twitter

my other blog on education, technology, and social justice

behind the machine

The Hunger Site
GoodSearch: You Search...We Give!

Following

  • RSS
  • Random
  • Archive
  • Ask simulating questions
  • Submit simulating things
  • Mobile

Effector Theme by Pixel Union.

Powered by Tumblr